The ANOVA results evolving the nominal predictor variables indicated that: The effect of participants’ sex on the PTU mean score was significant only for male vs. non-binary and female vs. non-binary individuals (F[2, 1384) = , p 2 = 0.039). Indeed, Tukey post-hoc comparisons test showed that female participants’ PTUS mean score was significantly lower than that of non-binary participants (1.77 [SD = 0.63] vs. 1.91 [SD = 0.70]) and that male participants’ PTUS mean score was significantly higher than that of non-binary participants (2.04 [SD = 0.74] vs. 1.91 [SD = 0.70]). There was no significant difference between male and female participants’ PTU mean score (2.04 [SD = 0.74] vs. 1.77 [SD = 0.63]). Also, the effect of the participants’ marital status on the PTUS mean score was not significant (F[3, 1383) = 2.233, p =.083, ?p 2 = 0.005). 951, p =.387, ?p 2 = 0.001). Finally, participants who were looking for Tinder online contacts that can lead to offline contacts had a higher PTUS mean score (2.05, SD = 0.62) than those who were not (1.76, SD = 0.74), F(1, 1385) = , p 2 = 0.043)
Multivariate relationships (predictors’ characteristics statistics)
Dining table step three show the brand new predictor parameters when you look at the positions order (servers reading design efficiency). The latest performance metrics of your machine training design into the try-put is actually below: Roentgen 2 (percentage of the newest difference throughout the benefit that’s informed me of the new predictors) = 58%; MSE (imply squared mistake) = 0.19.
Since the shown when you look at the Desk step three, among the 29 predictors regarding PTU, the brand new per cent upsurge in MSE (%IncMSE) varied away kissbrides.com Daha Fazla Bonus from a premier off (dealing motive to utilize Tinder) to a decreased off 0.13 (feeling trying to impulsivity), having an average value of 5.21 (partner selectiveness on Tinder). Continue reading Also, the result from participants’ sexual direction towards the PTUS rating is actually not very much (F[dos, 1384) = 0